Thin-skinned Biden is the most dangerous man in the world
President takes aim at Rupert Murdoch and conservative media
By David Keene - The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 12, 2022
OPINION:
President Biden wants Russian President Vladimir Putin hauled before the International Criminal Court and tried as a war criminal. As president, Mr. Biden must deal with folks he no doubt detests like China’s President Xi Jinping, who is waging an internal genocidal campaign against millions of China’s citizens while he dreams of the day China defeats the United States on the battlefield.
Iran’s terrorists will soon have nuclear weapons capability and suicide bombers at their disposal. A frighteningly unstable nutcase in North Korea has nuclear weapons and brags that he wouldn’t mind using them. Most of us would agree these are all incredibly dangerous men and would have difficulty deciding who is the most dangerous.
According to a new book by New York Times political journalists Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns, Mr. Biden has told insiders he regards someone else entirely as the “most dangerous man in the world.” And it’s not his predecessor, President Donald Trump, whom Mr. Biden calls a “threat to democracy.” It’s Rupert Murdoch. Mr. Murdoch has no nuclear weapons, missiles, nor a volunteer army of deplorables ready to applaud his every utterance, but his ownership of Fox News, “one of the most destructive forces in the United States” makes him, according to Mr. Biden, the “most dangerous man in the world.”
...
READ MORE: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/apr/12/thin-skinned-biden-is-the-most-dangerous-man-in-th/
____________
Of course, Mr. Murdoch also owns the New York Post and is no doubt therefore responsible for heaping abuse on the president’s son. Most of the legacy media along with his Silicon Valley supporters went to bat for Mr. Biden during the 2020 campaign because they all saw him as the best way to rid the nation of Mr. Trump. They excused or ignored his losing battle with the English language and covered for him when he took positions that might cost him votes. A Las Vegas newspaper edited his attacks on the Second Amendment out of an exclusive interview because the editors were afraid that if the public knew what he said they might be more reluctant to vote for him.
____________
So,
Did "they" do the right thing?