House Demands Answers on Highly Questionable Meeting Between Jack Smith Aide and WH Counsel's Office
By Nick Arama | 5:40 PM on August 29, 2023
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan is now demanding answers from Attorney General Merrick Garland and White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, as to why a prosecutor working with Special Counsel Jack Smith was meeting with people from the White House Counsel's Office at the White House multiple times in the run-up to Smith charging former President Donald Trump. Can we say collusion? Because that's exactly what it looks like.
Jay Bratt reportedly met with Biden officials at least three known times, the more recent and perhaps relevant one was in March 2023. Jordan wants communications about the meetings.
“According to recent reporting, Jay Bratt—a Department of Justice employee and top aide to Special Counsel Jack Smith—met with White House officials multiple times, just weeks before Mr. Smith indicted former President Donald Trump,” Jordan wrote.
“This new information raises serious concerns regarding the potential for a coordinated effort between the Department and the White House to investigate and prosecute President Biden’s political opponents.”
Jordan requested “[a]ll documents and communications referring or relating to any appointment, meeting, or other visit by Mr. Bratt to the White House or the Executive Office of the President” and those “between the Executive Office of the President and the Department of Justice referring or relating to the investigation and/or prosecutions of Special Counsel Jack Smith.
As we've reported before, Bratt was involved in the classified document investigation of Trump. He was reportedly the guy behind the raid on Mar-a-Lago in August 2022, contradicting some in the FBI who wanted to do a consensual search. He also argued against unsealing the affidavit used to justify the issuance of a search warrant.
Perhaps more troubling, as I reported previously, Bratt is the one who was accused by defendant Walt Nauta's attorney, Stanley Woodward, of bringing up the position that he'd applied for as a judge and then saying he, Bratt, didn't think Woodward was a "Trump guy" and would "do the right thing" about his client flipping. If ever there were a nasty move to try to coerce cooperation, that's it. Woodward was allegedly very rocked by it.
...
READ MORE: https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/08/29/house-demands-answers-on-highly-questionable-meeting-between-jack-smith-aide-and-wh-counsels-office-n2163197
***
Chân thành cám ơn Quý Anh Chị ghé thăm "conbenho Nguyễn Hoài Trang Blog"
Xin được lắng nghe ý kiến chia sẻ của Quý Anh Chị trực tiếp tại Diễn Đàn Paltalk: 1Latdo Tapdoan Vietgian CSVN Phanquoc Bannuoc .
Kính chúc Sức Khỏe Quý Anh Chị .
conbenho
Tiểu Muội quantu
Nguyễn Hoài Trang
30082023
_________________________
Cộng sản Việt Nam là TỘI ÁC
Bao che, dung dưỡng TỘI ÁC là ĐỒNG LÕA với TỘI ÁC
No comments:
Post a Comment